CVE-2026-67330
Published: Sat, 01 Aug 2026 13:17
Summary
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject pro
Details
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
Are YOU affected by CVE-2026-67330?
5-second check on your actual server. Reads /etc/os-release, uname -r, and dpkg-query; matches against the live USN + Debian Security Tracker feeds; tells you whether CVE-2026-67330 (and any other live CVE) applies. Anonymous, no signup.
curl https://mindsparkstack.com/scan.sh | bash
References
StackPatch runs this match against YOUR installed packages every hour
Free (3 servers) / from $9/mo (14-day free trial) / Solo $9/mo / Pro $29/mo / Team $79/mo. Indie pricing.